March 1, 2012
Wonklife: The cost of not controlling health-care costs

RAND Health researchers combined data from multiple sources to depict the effects of rising health care costs on a median-income married couple with two children covered by employer-sponsored insurance. The analysis compared the family’s health care cost burden in 1999 with that incurred in 2009. The take-away message: Although family income grew throughout the decade, the financial benefits that the family might have realized were largely consumed by health care cost growth, leaving them with only $95 more per month than in 1999. Had health care costs tracked the rise in the Consumer Price Index, rather than outpacing it, an average American family would have had an additional $450 per month — more than $5,000 per year — to spend on other priorities.

Nuff said.

— From SF.

(Source: rand.org)

  1. healthism reblogged this from wonklife
  2. stuffalexlikes reblogged this from wonklife
  3. connorlavallie reblogged this from jayparkinsonmd
  4. nursebuttons reblogged this from jayparkinsonmd
  5. adespain reblogged this from jayparkinsonmd
  6. braddogott reblogged this from theamericanbear
  7. theamericanbear reblogged this from andrewgraham
  8. workonprogress reblogged this from wonklife
  9. bellechantelle reblogged this from jayparkinsonmd
  10. shelbylifts reblogged this from wonklife
  11. daveloire reblogged this from jayparkinsonmd
  12. avivajazz reblogged this from jayparkinsonmd
  13. whileyouweresleeping reblogged this from wonklife and added:
    Nuff said. — From SF.
  14. thepushback reblogged this from wonklife
  15. andrewgraham reblogged this from wonklife
  16. jayparkinsonmd reblogged this from wonklife
Blog comments powered by Disqus